Illegal control of an enterprise and racketeering are complex legal issues that blur the boundaries between white-collar and traditional criminal offenses. At one end of the spectrum, these offenses are characterized as white-collar crimes such as fraud and embezzlement. On the other end, these crimes can mirror conventional offenses where the control of a business or organization is seized through direct, sometimes brutal methods, including physical threats or outright extortion.
If you are facing charges related to illegal control of an enterprise or racketeering in Phoenix, AZ, seeking experienced legal counsel is crucial. The Nava Law Firm is determined to build a solid defense curated to your specific needs for a favorable outcome for your case. Call us today to schedule a free consultation to learn how we can help and defend your rights.
In Arizona, particularly as stated under the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) §§ 13-2301, 13-2312, 13-2313, and 13-2314, the charges of "Racketeering" and "Illegal Control Of An Enterprise/Illegally Conducting An Enterprise" are among the most grave "White Collar" offenses.
A.R.S. §13-2312(A) specifies "the Illegal Control of an Enterprise" as when an individual gains or maintains control over an enterprise via Racketeering activities or its proceeds. These offenses encompass a wide range of activities, such as the following:
White Collar Offenses Include:
When "Blue Collar" offenses involve racketeering and are committed for financial gain, these crimes include:
In Arizona, the illegal control of an enterprise is a serious offense, with varying degrees of penalties based on the specifics of the crime. At its core, the charge is categorized as a Class Three (3) Felony, carrying significant legal ramifications.
The Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) §13-2312(B) details the offense of "Illegally Conducting an Enterprise." To fall under this statute, an individual, whether associated with or employed by an enterprise, must operate it through racketeering or knowingly participate in the operations of an enterprise that utilizes racketeering. This specific act is also designated as a Class Three (3) Felony, aligning it with the severe repercussions of illegal control.
However, the involvement of a minor in either of these offenses changes the legal landscape dramatically. If a person is found guilty of violating the statutes sections A or B, and a minor is involved in the related activities, the charge's severity escalates to a Class Two (2) Felony. The difference between these classifications is pronounced in terms of potential jail time:
Beyond the immediate threat of imprisonment, there are other significant consequences. Those convicted may face probation periods following their release. Moreover, the enduring impact of a felony conviction on one's record can alter life's trajectory. A felony status can hinder future employment opportunities, limit housing options, and restrict certain civil rights, such as voting or firearm ownership. Given the profound implications of such charges, securing knowledgeable legal representation is paramount for anyone facing these allegations.
Facing a conviction for illegal control of an enterprise or racketeering in Arizona carries long-lasting repercussions that extend beyond the immediate legal penalties. Given the ever-evolving landscape of criminal law, it's crucial for those accused to consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney promptly. The Nava Law Firm delves deep into the details of each case, employing strategies to challenge evidence or legal procedures. Our knowledge not only offers the possibility of reduced penalties or dismissed charges but also provides invaluable emotional and psychological support during a daunting legal process.
Our firm primarily serves the areas of Phoenix, Scottsdale, Chandler, Glendale and other areas around Arizona. If you are in need of an experienced Criminal Defense attorney in Maricopa County, please contact us today to schedule your free case evaluation.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Many factors contribute to providing legal advice, including the specific facts of a situation. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. Armando Nava is licensed to practice law in Arizona. We invite you to contact us, but please be aware that contacting us does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until an attorney-client relationship has been established.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
A black man was pulled over by Salt River Police Department while visiting from out of town. Despite showing no signs of impairment, the officers arrested him and charged him with DUI Drugs. We investigated the case heavily and interviewed every officer involved. Ultimately, a motion to suppress was filed and granted after an evidentiary hearing before a Judge.
A man was charged with attacking a family with a knife. After reviewing the evidence, it was determined that the instrument used was not a knife at all. The Grand Jury had been misled, so we filed a motion challenging the grand jury presentation. The prosecutor, confronted with the truth, agreed to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor with no jail time.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
A man was out on a walk and was stopped by police because he was in the area of an attempted vehicle theft. The man maintained his innocence, but the owner of the truck identified him as the man he saw attempt to steal it. We worked tirelessly to prepare a defense and get the prosecution to see reason. The State wouldn’t budge, so the case went to trial. After a 4 day trial, the jury took approximately 10 minutes to return a Not Guilty verdict.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
A client was charged with resist arrest after being targeted by police during the protests of Summer 2020. Our firm developed a strategy with activists and members of the media that led to a dismissal of our client’s case and, eventually, all cases connected to the political prosecution of the protesters.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
A woman and her boyfriend were arguing over the cleaning of their apartment. The police were called after things escalated and the woman was arrested. The Mesa City Prosecutors originally wanted the woman to do jail time. After working the case and providing background information, we were able to get the prosecutor to allow the woman to complete classes in exchange for a dismissal.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
We have experience managing violent cases that fall under the categories of murder and manslaughter. Out of respect for all Nava Law Firm clients that fall under this case type, we are not providing any information on our website. If you or a loved one have been charged with one of these serious charges, do not speak to police officers and please contact our firm immediately to get a free consultation.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.