Being accused of fraud by the State of Arizona can carry significant consequences. Beyond immediate legal ramifications, these charges cast a shadow over a person's reputation, possibly affecting their career, familial relationships, and future opportunities. Especially in areas like finance and law, employers might be wary of retaining or hiring someone with a fraud-related history. Even if your crimes are acquitted, having a history of being investigated can impact numerous aspects of one's life.
Recognizing the seriousness of these potential outcomes, anyone facing fraud allegations should seek immediate legal assistance. Investigations into white-collar crimes, such as fraud, can sometimes trap innocent individuals if they are unprepared to defend themselves. The Nava Law Firm is experienced in handling fraud cases and emphasizes the principle of "innocent until proven guilty." Our team acts as a tenacious advocate and guide for our clients, ensuring they take on the legal system with the best possible defense.
Fraud doesn't just pertain to one type of transaction or a singular act. It can encompass everything from credit card, mortgage, and insurance fraud to even more complex issues like securities fraud or corporate misrepresentations. Each category can have specific legal considerations, but all revolve around the central theme of deception to gain an advantage or benefit. Here are the core elements of what is considered fraud in Arizona:
Fraud, as a criminal charge, comes with variations based on the context in which it is committed. Understanding the diversity of fraud charges is essential to comprehend the extent of these charges:
Each fraud type comes with its unique set of elements the prosecution must prove. The complexity and voluminous paperwork associated with fraud cases can be overwhelming. Hence, handling these charges necessitates the experience of a competent attorney. This professional must be well-versed in the nuances of fraud law and can dissect complicated information and convey it transparently to their client. Their role extends beyond legal counsel; they become an individual's primary advocate, seeking a favorable outcome for their client in this legal scenario.
Defending against a fraud charge requires unparalleled attention to detail. At Nava Law Office, we are experienced in criminal defense strategies, particularly for fraud cases in Phoenix, AZ. Attorney Armando Nava stands out with his extensive experience and strategic approach. Committed to safeguarding clients from the penalties of fraud charges, Mr. Nava is known for his aggressive advocacy, ensuring that each defense is tailored, rights are protected, and all evidence and testimonies are rigorously examined.
Our firm primarily serves the areas of Phoenix, Scottsdale, Chandler, Tempe and other areas around Arizona. If you are in need of an experienced D.U.I. attorney in Maricopa County, please contact us today to schedule your free case evaluation.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Many factors contribute to providing legal advice, including the specific facts of a situation. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. Armando Nava is licensed to practice law in Arizona. We invite you to contact us, but please be aware that contacting us does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until an attorney-client relationship has been established.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
A black man was pulled over by Salt River Police Department while visiting from out of town. Despite showing no signs of impairment, the officers arrested him and charged him with DUI Drugs. We investigated the case heavily and interviewed every officer involved. Ultimately, a motion to suppress was filed and granted after an evidentiary hearing before a Judge.
A man was charged with attacking a family with a knife. After reviewing the evidence, it was determined that the instrument used was not a knife at all. The Grand Jury had been misled, so we filed a motion challenging the grand jury presentation. The prosecutor, confronted with the truth, agreed to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor with no jail time.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
A man was out on a walk and was stopped by police because he was in the area of an attempted vehicle theft. The man maintained his innocence, but the owner of the truck identified him as the man he saw attempt to steal it. We worked tirelessly to prepare a defense and get the prosecution to see reason. The State wouldn’t budge, so the case went to trial. After a 4 day trial, the jury took approximately 10 minutes to return a Not Guilty verdict.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
A client was charged with resist arrest after being targeted by police during the protests of Summer 2020. Our firm developed a strategy with activists and members of the media that led to a dismissal of our client’s case and, eventually, all cases connected to the political prosecution of the protesters.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
A woman and her boyfriend were arguing over the cleaning of their apartment. The police were called after things escalated and the woman was arrested. The Mesa City Prosecutors originally wanted the woman to do jail time. After working the case and providing background information, we were able to get the prosecutor to allow the woman to complete classes in exchange for a dismissal.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.
We have experience managing violent cases that fall under the categories of murder and manslaughter. Out of respect for all Nava Law Firm clients that fall under this case type, we are not providing any information on our website. If you or a loved one have been charged with one of these serious charges, do not speak to police officers and please contact our firm immediately to get a free consultation.
Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.