Learn More About Our Video Consultations Due To The COVID-19 Outbreak.

When Federal and State Law Conflict, Which Law Applies?

By:
Armando Nava

The federal government does not recognize a distinction between medical and recreational marijuana, both are considered controlled substances. Under the Controlled Substance Act, Marijuana is classified as a Schedule I drug. This means that the federal government believes marijuana has a high abuse potential and has no medical value.

How do Federal Prosecutors Handle the Conflicting Laws?

When new state laws are at odds with federal law, federal attorney’s will look to the federal government for guidance. Although marijuana, medical and recreational, has always been illegal on the federal level, former US Attorney Generals have published memorandums guiding federal prosecutors and law enforcement in how to handle the discrepancy.

Under the Obama Administration

In October of 2009, Deputy Attorney General David Ogden announced formal guidelines, known as the Ogden-Memo, for how federal prosecutors should handle newly enacted laws authorizing the use of medical marijuana. It advised federal prosecutors to “not focus federal resources in your states on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.” This did not preclude investigation or prosecution of medical marijuana, merely it just advised to review medical marijuana cases on a case-by-case basis with the guidance of resource allocation. The idea behind it was that there are more important targets for drug enforcement than the people who really are sick.

Once marijuana was legalized for recreational use, federal prosecutors were again looking at the federal government for guidance. In 2012, Colorado and Washington legalized marijuana for adult use, the next year former US Attorney General James E. Cole issued formal guidelines, known as the Cole-Memo, for how federal prosecutors should handle the new law discrepancy. It again listed certain priorities that should still be investigated and prosecuted. This memorandum was modeled after the Ogden Memo and unintentionally created a huge policy shift. Federal government, like the Ogden-Memo, de-prioritizing enforcing marijuana prohibition and shifted to a more hands-off approach.

Under the Trump Administration

Up to this point, there seemed to be an understanding of how the discrepancy in laws were to be handled. Once the Trump administration took charge, people were weary on how the federal government would handle these memorandums. In August 2017, the Task Force on Crime Reduction and Public Safety found no new policy suggestions and stated that federal prosecutors should continue as before. However, in January 2018, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions, under the rescinded the Cole-Memo. Now, federal prosecutors can use their own discretion to enforce federal marijuana law, medical and recreational, even in states where it is legal like Arizona. The goal is to “return to a rule of law” where federal prosecutors decide how they want to go after drug offenses.

So Where Does That Leave Us?

Regardless of the Cole-Memo being enforced or rescinded, both medical and recreational marijuana has always been illegal on the federal level. The only change after the Cole-Memo being rescinded is now federal prosecutors will treat these cases like any case, using their discretion on what to charge.

US Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ announcement is still relatively new, it is not yet clear how the change will affect Arizona. The medical marijuana industry is likely too big to undue and there are constitutional amendments that block the Justice Department from interfering with it. However, recreational marijuana is not off the table. In a Republican-dominated state, like Arizona, some worry that the prosecutorial mentality will be harsh on marijuana users after the announcement.

Marijuana law may be complicated, but The Nava Law Firm understands the law and knows how to use it to your advantage. Contact us immediately if you find yourself in a pinch with the law.

Expertise DUI AwardTop 40 Under 40 Badge10 Best Client Satisfaction Award for Nava LawBadges for Nava LawExpertise Criminal Defense Award
Image of Arizona
Have A Case In Arizona?
FREE CONSULTATION
Copyright © 2021 Nava Law. All rights reserved.
Designed by:
Lab Coat Marketing Beaker Logo
PROVEN CASE RESULTS:
DUIDUI DrugsAggravated AssaultTheftResist ArrestDomestic ViolenceMurder
Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Arizona desert outside phoenix, Sonoran Desert
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
DUI Drugs (Marijuana)
Case Result:
Case Dismissed

A black man was pulled over by Salt River Police Department while visiting from out of town. Despite showing no signs of impairment, the officers arrested him and charged him with DUI Drugs. We investigated the case heavily and interviewed every officer involved. Ultimately, a motion to suppress was filed and granted after an evidentiary hearing before a Judge.

Actuation:
Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Case Result:
Reduced to a misdemeanor

Short Description: A man was charged with attacking a family with a knife. After reviewing the evidence, it was determined that the instrument used was not a knife at all. The Grand Jury had been misled, so we filed a motion challenging the grand jury presentation. The prosecutor, confronted with the truth, agreed to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor with no jail time.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Theft of Means of Transportation
Case Result:
Not Guilty after jury trial

A man was out on a walk and was stopped by police because he was in the area of an attempted vehicle theft. The man maintained his innocence, but the owner of the truck identified him as the man he saw attempt to steal it. We worked tirelessly to prepare a defense and get the prosecution to see reason. The State wouldn’t budge, so the case went to trial. After a 4 day trial, the jury took approximately 10 minutes to return a Not Guilty verdict.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Resist Arrest
Case Result:
Dismissed

A client was charged with resist arrest after being targeted by police during the protests of Summer 2020. Our firm developed a strategy with activists and members of the media that led to a dismissal of out client’s case and, eventually, all cases connected to the political prosecution of the protesters. (Maybe link to some of the cases?)

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Assault & Disorderly Conduct – Domestic Violence
Case Result:
Dismissal after Diversion

A woman and her boyfriend were arguing over the cleaning of their apartment. The police were called after things escalated and the woman was arrested. The Mesa City Prosecutors originally wanted the woman to do jail time. After working the case and providing background information, we were able to get the prosecutor to allow the woman to complete classes in exchange for a dismissal.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

We have experience managing violent cases that fall under the categories of murder and manslaughter. Out of respect for all Nava Law Firm clients that fall under this case type, we are not providing any information on our website. If you or a loved one have been charged with one of these serious charges, do not speak to police officers and please contact our firm immediately to get a free consultation.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.