Learn More About Our Video Consultations Due To The COVID-19 Outbreak.

TED Talk: How Reliable Is Your Memory?

By:
Armando Nava

TED Talk: How Reliable Is Your Memory?

What do you truly remember? Are your memories as accurate as you believe? Should your memory be used as an accurate piece of evidence in the courtroom?

We often think of our memories as fixed, something we can depend on. But what if someone told you that your memory may not be as accurate as you thought? What if someone told you that your memory may be entirely fabricated?

Recently, I watched a TED Talk by Elizabeth Loftus, a psychological scientist who studies memory. Rather than studying memory loss, Loftus focuses on false memories. These are memories our minds have altered from what actually occurred and memories our minds have created about events that never occurred at all.

Loftus began her talk with Steve Titus’s story. Titus was a man who was on his way back home, after a romantic meal with his fiancé, when he was pulled over and arrested. The reason being that his vehicle and physical appearance were similar to that of a man who had recently committed a rape in the area. The victim looked at a photo lineup and told police that Titus looked “the closest” to the man who had raped her. However, by the time trial came around, that same victim altered her story and testified that she was “absolutely positive that’s the man,” referring to Titus. Based on this testimony a jury convicted Titus. Though Titus was eventually exonerated after a journalist tracked down the real rapist, Titus had already lost his fiancé, his job, his savings, and all faith in the judicial system. Titus had become obsessed with what the system had done to him, and he began working day and night to fight the system that had wronged him. The stress from this fight caused a stress-related heart attack, killing Titus at the age of 35 years old.

This is what sparked Loftus’s curiosity and made her question how the victim’s memory went from ‘closest’ to a ‘positive’ identification?

Loftus has found that many people believe that their memory works like a recording device, where you can call it up and replay it; when in reality this is far from true. She goes on to say that memory works, “A little bit like a Wikipedia page: you can add and change it, but so can other people.” Misinformation is everywhere, that should come with no surprise to anyone. We receive this misinformation by leading questions, talking to other witnesses, or media coverage about some event we may or may not have experienced. When someone is fed misinformation, their memory can be distorted, contaminated, fabricated, or even completely changed.

So what do we do with eyewitness testimony then? At its most basic form, eyewitness testimony is when a person witnesses a crime or a portion of it and later gets up on the stand and recalls from memory for the courtroom all the details of the witnessed event. When an eyewitness stands up in front of the courtroom and describes what happened from his/her own perspective, it can be extremely compelling to the trier of fact. It’s a way that counsel can paint a picture in the jury’s mind without doing it themselves. Although defense attorneys everywhere try to attack the credibility of these witnesses during a trial, it is difficult for the trier of fact to take an eyewitness’s testimony with a grain of salt.

So, if the science is out there, why do we put so much weight on eye witness testimony, which is dependent on memory?

We as a society still place eyewitness testimony as one of the most persuasive forms of evidence presented in court. But, just think about it, if individuals are prone to recalling distorted, contaminated, fabricated, or changed memories, how accurate can eyewitness testimony be? These false memories come with some hefty consequences in courts everywhere, where the stakes are unbelievably high.

So what does this all mean? Unfortunately, false memories feel just as real as those which actually happened. That is because our minds tend to fill in any gaps for us. When it comes to memory, be cautious. If it’s not backed by concrete evidence, maybe take it with a grain of salt.

Expertise DUI AwardTop 40 Under 40 Badge10 Best Client Satisfaction Award for Nava LawBadges for Nava LawExpertise Criminal Defense Award
Image of Arizona
Have A Case In Arizona?
FREE CONSULTATION
Copyright © 2021 Nava Law. All rights reserved.
Designed by:
Lab Coat Marketing Beaker Logo
PROVEN CASE RESULTS:
DUIDUI DrugsAggravated AssaultTheftResist ArrestDomestic ViolenceMurder
Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Arizona desert outside phoenix, Sonoran Desert
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
DUI Drugs (Marijuana)
Case Result:
Case Dismissed

A black man was pulled over by Salt River Police Department while visiting from out of town. Despite showing no signs of impairment, the officers arrested him and charged him with DUI Drugs. We investigated the case heavily and interviewed every officer involved. Ultimately, a motion to suppress was filed and granted after an evidentiary hearing before a Judge.

Actuation:
Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Case Result:
Reduced to a misdemeanor

Short Description: A man was charged with attacking a family with a knife. After reviewing the evidence, it was determined that the instrument used was not a knife at all. The Grand Jury had been misled, so we filed a motion challenging the grand jury presentation. The prosecutor, confronted with the truth, agreed to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor with no jail time.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Theft of Means of Transportation
Case Result:
Not Guilty after jury trial

A man was out on a walk and was stopped by police because he was in the area of an attempted vehicle theft. The man maintained his innocence, but the owner of the truck identified him as the man he saw attempt to steal it. We worked tirelessly to prepare a defense and get the prosecution to see reason. The State wouldn’t budge, so the case went to trial. After a 4 day trial, the jury took approximately 10 minutes to return a Not Guilty verdict.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Resist Arrest
Case Result:
Dismissed

A client was charged with resist arrest after being targeted by police during the protests of Summer 2020. Our firm developed a strategy with activists and members of the media that led to a dismissal of out client’s case and, eventually, all cases connected to the political prosecution of the protesters. (Maybe link to some of the cases?)

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Assault & Disorderly Conduct – Domestic Violence
Case Result:
Dismissal after Diversion

A woman and her boyfriend were arguing over the cleaning of their apartment. The police were called after things escalated and the woman was arrested. The Mesa City Prosecutors originally wanted the woman to do jail time. After working the case and providing background information, we were able to get the prosecutor to allow the woman to complete classes in exchange for a dismissal.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

We have experience managing violent cases that fall under the categories of murder and manslaughter. Out of respect for all Nava Law Firm clients that fall under this case type, we are not providing any information on our website. If you or a loved one have been charged with one of these serious charges, do not speak to police officers and please contact our firm immediately to get a free consultation.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.