Articles

Arizona Criminal Defense Attorney

Exposing Insurance Companies Profiting Off the Bail System

A new ACLU and Color of Change report, “Selling Off Our Freedom: How Insurance Corporations Have Taken over Our Bail System” condemns for-profit businesses for their role in mass incarceration and racial inequality.

How Does Bail Work?

Most people know, either from experience or from reading the news, that people who are arrested might receive the option of paying bail in order to get out of jail during the pretrial period. Generally, judges set bail based on the type of crime for which the suspect has been arrested. Suspects may request lower bail, or request release on recognizance. Either way, suspects have to comply with conditions of release in order to avoid being arrested again.

Many countries offer the option of bail as an alternative to imprisonment while a defendant awaits trial, based on the principle that no one should be incarcerated before they’re proven guilty. This monetary deposit represents an agreement that the accused will show up for their court dates. After the trial, provided the suspect shows up to their court dates, he or she receives a refund.

What happens to bail money if the defendant forfeits it by not appearing in court? In such cases, local regulations stipulate how the money will be used, usually by the courts or law enforcement agencies. Forfeited bail belongs to the government, not to for-profit agencies.

Profiting Off the Bail System

Jailed suspects can post bail with the courts directly, or they can purchase bail bonds from private insurers. The practice of selling bail bonds for profit is unlawful in every country in the world, except the United States and the Philippines. Bail bondsmen who work for insurance companies target criminal defendants when selling their products, and they charge a non-refundable fee to post bail. Additionally, many corporations do not return the bail money after the trial, even when no convictions result. So, if you contract with an insurance company selling bail bonds, you will never see the money they collect as a fee on top of the bail payment. In some cases, you won’t even see the bail refunded by the courts — money to which you should be entitled.

How Insurance Corporations Create Inequalities

The report outlines several alarming ways in which for-profit insurance companies harm individuals and families, particularly people of color and low-income individuals and families:

  • Selective Contracts: Bail bondsmen can choose not to offer their product to individuals they consider high-risk. As private companies, they care about their bottom line and they’re unlikely to accept applications from people they think might not be able to pay the fees. This results in racial and income-based discrimination.
  • Lasting Debt: While posting bail with the courts results in a refund at the end of the trial, many for-profit companies keep the money, even if defendants comply with all court orders.
  • Exploitative Contracts: Families can be locked into payment plans long after their case is resolved. Hidden fees and penalties may apply. Through contracts, individuals and families often sign away their privacy by agreeing to searches, surveillance, and access to personal information.
  • Terms Allowing for Re-Arrest: In general, when you are awaiting trial, you can be arrested for fleeing prosecution or failure to appear in court. In one case study, a corporate contract allowed the company to revoke bail and seek re-arrest for late payments, disconnected phone numbers and accepting a job offer without immediately notifying the bail company.

Reforming the Bail System

Civil rights advocates have called for the elimination of for-profit bail companies for nearly a century. The very idea of having to pay to get out of jail when you are presumed innocent raises an ethical dilemma. The Eighth Amendment prohibits judges from setting excessive bail; while this prompts debate about how we define “excessive,” at least the protection exists.

The constitutional loophole? The 8th Amendment regulates government agencies, not for-profit insurance corporations. Prohibiting for-profit bail corporations is the first step to correcting these injustices; not to mention it will put us on par with most of the rest of the world.

For statistics, infographics, and case studies, access the full report for free.

Armando Nava's Criminal Defense expertise has been featured in the following publications:
ABC 13 logo az central logofox 10 Phoenix logoAZ mirror imagePhoenix New Times logo
5 star review
Manuel Vasquez

Armando is best attorney hands down! Awesome ways of communicating with me utilizing multiple forms of communication like his portal/phone/ or text! He also will always try to find the best deals for you possible. Lastly, very resourceful as to who he can verify you with for different services/needs if he’s not able to help you with something!

Google Logo
5 star review
Joan Espinoza

If I could give Armando Nava more than a 5 star review I would do it in a heart beat. I have known him for a while now and he is someone I genuinely respect and admire. He is there for you no matter how hard or easy your case is, he does not judge you, and he does everything in his power to make the client satisfied.

Google Logo
5 star review
Aramis

I am writing this review almost a year after my charge (that I thought was going to do a year in jail) was dismissed. Armando has been very transparent and always available. I still ask him for legal advice even after my case was finished and he always helps. He will be a great ally for you and has been a dear friend for me.

Avvo Logo
desert outside phoenix, Sonoran Desert
Image of Arizona
Have A Case In Arizona?
FREE CONSULTATION
Expertise
Top 40 Under 40 Badge10 Best Client Satisfaction Award for Nava Law
Lead Counsel VerifiedExpertise
Copyright © 2024 Nava Law. All rights reserved.
Designed by:
Lab Coat Marketing
PROVEN CASE RESULTS:
DUIDUI DrugsAggravated AssaultTheftResist ArrestDomestic ViolenceMurder
Accusation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Accusation:
DUI Drugs (Marijuana)
Case Result:
Case Dismissed

A black man was pulled over by Salt River Police Department while visiting from out of town. Despite showing no signs of impairment, the officers arrested him and charged him with DUI Drugs. We investigated the case heavily and interviewed every officer involved. Ultimately, a motion to suppress was filed and granted after an evidentiary hearing before a Judge.

Accusation:
Aggravated Assault w/ a Deadly Weapon
Case Result:
Reduced to a misdemeanor

A man was charged with attacking a family with a knife. After reviewing the evidence, it was determined that the instrument used was not a knife at all. The Grand Jury had been misled, so we filed a motion challenging the grand jury presentation. The prosecutor, confronted with the truth, agreed to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor with no jail time.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Accusation:
Theft of Means of Transportation
Case Result:
Not Guilty after jury trial

A man was out on a walk and was stopped by police because he was in the area of an attempted vehicle theft. The man maintained his innocence, but the owner of the truck identified him as the man he saw attempt to steal it. We worked tirelessly to prepare a defense and get the prosecution to see reason. The State wouldn’t budge, so the case went to trial. After a 4 day trial, the jury took approximately 10 minutes to return a Not Guilty verdict.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Accusation:
Resist Arrest
Case Result:
Dismissed

A client was charged with resist arrest after being targeted by police during the protests of Summer 2020. Our firm developed a strategy with activists and members of the media that led to a dismissal of our client’s case and, eventually, all cases connected to the political prosecution of the protesters.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Accusation:
Assault & Disorderly Conduct – Domestic Violence
Case Result:
Dismissal after Diversion

A woman and her boyfriend were arguing over the cleaning of their apartment. The police were called after things escalated and the woman was arrested. The Mesa City Prosecutors originally wanted the woman to do jail time. After working the case and providing background information, we were able to get the prosecutor to allow the woman to complete classes in exchange for a dismissal.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

We have experience managing violent cases that fall under the categories of murder and manslaughter. Out of respect for all Nava Law Firm clients that fall under this case type, we are not providing any information on our website. If you or a loved one have been charged with one of these serious charges, do not speak to police officers and please contact our firm immediately to get a free consultation.

Actuation:
Second in time DUI
Case Result:
Charge reduced with no jail

Woman was charged with her second DUI within 7 years after being involved in a collision in Scottsdale. Through our investigation, we found multiple mistakes made by the arresting officer. These errors were used      to get the prosecution to reduce the alleged offense to a charge with no jail time.